|
The Association of Drivers against Daytime Running Lights - Welcome
|
DRL masking a motorcyclist. The Japanese Government do not mandate full power DRL ( Study - JASIC 2003) | ||||||||||
Views on DRL from:
Updated 03 July 2008 © admin@dadrluk.orangehome.co.uk | ||||||||||||
|
The decreasing trend in UK road accidents has levelled off despite advances in vehicle design. We believe a contributory factor is due to increased use of full power distracting daytime running headlights known as DRL which make vulnerable road users less conspicuous. This website is intended to be a source of reasoned argument against Daytime Running Lights (DRL), setting out the safety, environmental and health problems, all known international pro and anti DRL studies and to promulgate a simple Solution which offers non glaring daytime running lights with minimal pollution.
If the European Commission were really concerned with reducing accidents why have they not mandated: Ø Advanced driving tests and regular re-tests? Ø Eyesight tests at three year intervals? Ø headlights which do not cause glare and dazzle at night? To combat the spread of dangerous DRL, an alliance has been formed comprising of UK and European pedestrians, ramblers, cyclists, motorcyclists, animal and drivers associations:
This website is kindly hosted by Safespeed – a website promoting intelligent road safety at www.safespeed.org.uk Particularly see the charts at www.safespeed.org.uk/stats/graphs.html depicting how the annual decline in UK accidents has halted probably due to government policy of persecuting motorists instead of investing in positive safety measures such as advanced driver training and engineering improvements. | ||||||||||||